Happy Birthday to Me!

Today is my birthday. Yippee! I'm having a drinks party later tonight, and my boss is going to be leaving early, so it's shaping up to me a good day.

I'll be over at my other blog Scandalous Women blogging about my birthday buddy Marie Antoinette. Stop over and check it out.

And here's one of my birthday horoscopes:

November 2, 2007 -- You will be energetically involved in partnership issues over the next 12 months, but don't get so energetic that the people you live, work and do business with feel you are pushing them too hard. Not everyone is as driven to succeed as you are. Remember that and make allowances - or risk
losing friends.

It's NaNoWriMo Time Again!

It's November 1st, which means it's NaNoWriMo time again. For those of you who don't know, NaNoWriMo stands for National Novel Writing Month. The goal is over 30 days to write a 175 page novel, or 50,000 words without stopping. That means no editing whatsoever. For those how have an internal critic/editor sitting on our shoulder on a daily basis, like I do, telling you that every word you write is total crap, NaNoWriMo is a godsend. For the next month, I just write, and write and write. And hopefully at the end, I have something salvageable.

Last time I did this two years ago, I wrote 250 pages of a YA novel that ended up in the bin, but it got me excited enough about my premise to totally rewrite the novel in a month with a new plot and a new set of characters which I might never have done if it hadn't been for good ole NaNoWriMo. Part of the reason why I did NaNoWriMo the last time was because I knew that Lani Diane Rich had written her RITA award winning first novel, Time Off for Good Behavior during NaNoWriMo. I figured if she could do it, so could I.

This time, I'm better prepared. I have more of a handle of what I want to write and that thing called plot. My characters are fully fleshed out in my head, and I have a list of scenes that I want to incorporate into the story. Also, I've written down 5 character adjectives for my hero and heroine that I'm going to try and plant the seeds of in every scene. I'm off to a pretty good start, I've written 4 pages so far this morning. Of course, the first day is always the best.

This caps off a pretty awesome week so far. Yesterday afternoon, I got to go to a taping of The Daily Show with that god among men, Jon Stewart. Totally fab. I highly recommend that if you know you're going to be in New York a few months in advance that you try and get tickets. It's a short taping since the show is only a half and hour. The hard part is standing on line and waiting to get in. Fortunately, I brought a friend with me to chat to, although I have tons of research books that I could have been reading while I waited.

Even the warm up comedian was funny for a change. Then when I got to my night job, I found out I was getting a $50 because there were so few people working last night. Yippee! Mama needs a new pair of shoes.

Now excuse me while I go check my word count.

Thanks for reading!

EKM

Happy Halloween!

I love Halloween. I think it's my favorite holiday of the year, apart from my birthday which should be a national holiday. Part of the reason that I love Halloween is that it's two days before my birthday meaning that I get to celebrate for more than just one day. Plus any day that I get to dress up in costume is a good day for me.

This year, I went to a Halloween party on Saturday as Demeter, Goddess of the Earth. Appropriately enough it was pouring down rain in the morning, but by the time that I had to get ready to get dressed for the party, the weather had turned beautiful. I'm totally taking credit for that. After all, you don't want to mess with Mother Nature.

Remember those commercials from the 1970's for margarine. If you're old enough to remember them, then you had a good idea of what my costume looked like. It was a peach off the shoulder dress with a green overlay, long on the sides but very short in the front.

When I arrived at the party with my frozen bottle of champagne (who knew that champagne froze?) and my caviar dish, one of the guys at the party commented on my costume, and then wanted to know if it could be shorter in the front! That's the sign of a successful costume. Over the years, I've gone as a female bucccaneer, Anne Boleyn, a Desperate Housewife, Druscilla from Buffy the Vampire Slayer and last year, International Woman of Mystery, Femme Fatale.

I have to work tonight, so I'm missing the Halloween Parade in the village, which I went to once, just for the experience. Unfortunately, I tend to get claustrophobic in crowds, so I didn't enjoy it that much. As for trick or treating, I was never allowed to go as a child, not even in the building because my mother was too afraid of my getting razor blades or bad apples to let me go. So when I got older and we had Halloween dances at school, I more than made up for not getting to trick or treat.

Gosh, I have so many fond memories of Halloween parties. I mentioned the one where I snagged the Aussie cowboy, but I remember going to a party in college at a frat party and making out with some guy wearing a black slip. And we had an awesome party in London one year at a friend's house in Kilburn where we sat around telling ghost stories and smoking pot. Did I just say that?

I don't know that I've ever had anything weird like pyschic phenomenon or anything happen to me despite the fact that it is All Hallow's Eve. Mary Jo Putney has a great post over at Word Wenches on the origins of Halloween.

What are you favorite Halloween memories?

This is your brain without sleep!

This is exactly what I wish I could be doing right now. I didn't get home from work until 3 a.m. and I've had about 4 hours of sleep and I'm dragging. If only I lived in Spain where I could be having a siesta right now. Instead I'm here at work making notes on the book I hope to write during NaNoWriMo in a few days.

So far, the plotting and the characters are coming together nicely. I had planned on working on my YA partial that I started back in May, but these characters just came to be, begging for their story to be told, ever since I saw this final scene on "I Wanna Be a Soap Star."

Yes, the premise of my new novel was inspired by a reality TV show. And aspects of my own life. Yet, I already know these characters intimately and the scenes that I want to write and the parts of the city where my characters live. In some ways, this book is going to be a valentine to New York City in the fall, and how magical it can be.

But right now, I just want to put my head down on the desk and nap.

Thanks for reading,

EKM

Mama, don't let your baby grow up to be drama critics!

Yesterday, I went to a roundtable at the Philoctetes Center featuring three important drama critics of the 20th Century, Robert Brustein, Eric Bentley, and Stanley Kauffmann on the state of dramatic criticism in the United States. For anyone who doesn't know these 3 gentleman, Eric Bentley is the author of Playwright as Thinker which was published in 1946, Robert Brustein as well as being a critic was also the head of the Yale School of Drama and the artistic director of the Yale Repertory Theater, before moving on to Harvard to found the American Repertory Theater and the MFA program. Stanley Kauffmann was the drama critic at the New York Times in the 1960's as well as for The New Republic. Combined these men have about 200 years of dramatic criticism behind them.

It was interesting to hear these men speak because they were around with Arthur Miller and Tennessee Williams were premiering their first plays, back in the days when Broadway was mainly filled with either drawing room comedies like Philip Barry's or the melodrama's of Eugene O'Neill. The general consensus of the panel was that dramatic criticism is on the wane at the moment. Oh people still write reviews either for web-sites like theatermania or for the newspapers but the kind of critical thinking that these men brought to their reviews no longer exists, at least in this country, where most cities have one major newspaper.

New York still has 5 if you count The New York Sun and Newsday, but what the newspapers and most magazines do now are just simple reviews, so historical context for the most part. Entertainment Weekly, when they do review theater, operate on the A through F critique. I can't imagine a critic like Kenneth Tynan or Robert Brustein ever resorting to a letter grade in a review. Brustein mentioned that when they initiated the dramatic criticism major at Yale, there were no jobs for the graduates once they were done, so the program shifted to dramaturgy.

There was a time when everyone knew the name of the big drama critics in New York, even if you didn't live in New York. People like Brooks Atkinson or Walter Kerr. The last person to have that kind of name recognition was Frank Rich aka The Butcher of Broadway. Or maybe Clive Barnes, who I once saw sleep (not just sleep, snore) through a production of Joe Orton's Loot, which he then gave a rave review to.

I was fortunate enough to have Michael Billington, the chief drama critic of the Guardian, as my dramatic criticism instructor when I studied at The British American Drama Academy twenty years ago in London. Each week we would go to see a show, and then we would get to dicuss it with him in class. We were encouraged to keep a theater journal of the other plays and musicals that we saw, and later on we had a tutorial with him, where we went to his house in Chiswick to drink tea and read aloud from our journals.

He was the first critic that I ever read where I had to keep the dictionary handy to read his reviews. What was fantastic about the class was that we were allowed to argue our views with him. My friend Joanna actually managed to convince him to reconsider his review of Sam Shepherd's play A Lie of the Mind by arguing that the play had been damaged by an inferior staging and bad casting.

Keeping that journal allowed me to see theater in a new way. When I did my semester abroad in college, we also had to keep a theater journal which I still have. I actually took it down when I got home last night to read over what I had wrote. Most of it was of the variety that "Ian McKellan is a god and I worship him,' and 'Antony Sher is the most exciting actor ever to appear on the English stage, and I want to have his baby.'

Of course little did I know at the time that I wasn't going to be having either of their babies since they don't play for my team! But there were reviews where I ripped apart a production that the RSC did of Romeo & Juliet for using excess props on stage (Tybalt drove on in a red Porsche, Mercutio did a frantic disco dance, played the electric guitar and jumped into a swimming pool during the ball scene, and Juliet was listening to her walkman and reading Vogue before launching into her speech about wanting night to come so that Romeo would arrive), and not paying enough attention to the text.

The point was made that besides most newspapers shrinking their theater coverage or dropping it all together, there is a distinct lack of critical thinking about much of anything in this country, which I tend to agree with. When I was in high school, we were forced constantly to think critically in history and in English class, but I think that most public schools gloss over it, or the kids just don't get it. Their thinking is reserved for getting to the next level in whatever X-Box game they are playing.

Which is a shame. One of the reasons that I love Vanity Fair magazine is that you get such a great mix of fluff and serious pieces (Oh and James Wolcott who writes a monthly column for the magazine spilled his wine on me yesterday).

The best dramatic criticism (and I've read most of Robert Brustein's work) opens up your mind and makes you really think about your response to a play or to a movie. It involves all of your senses. I've learned about plays and playwrights that I never would have known existed if it hadn't been for reading men like Brustein and Kenneth Tynan.

It's funny because on the other hand, literary criticism just ruins reading for me. I don't want to read about F.Scott Fitzgerald's use of imagery, or what the green light means at the end of The Great Gatsby. I don't really care.

Thanks for reading,

EKM

Hands on New Orleans

Okay, my God! I had the winning bid on eBay to have Abby Zidle, Senior Editor of Pocket Books read the first 30 pages of my manuscript. I had no idea that I would ever have the winning bid. At first it kind of freaked me out but Hands on New Orleans is such a good cause. Now I just have to decide which manuscript to have her read. The YA or my Chick-Lit novel. I'm thinking the YA. I'm kind of psyched about it. I've met Abby a few times at events and she always has amazing shoes.

Oh, and I just bought my ticket to London! I'm definitely going now. Airfare wasn't bad. I have to fly into Gatwick, which is like the worst airport, at least it was last year since they were doing so much construction. But the airfare was cheaper because everyone flies into Heathrow.

Writer's Block, Oh My!

So last night I went to the Philoctetes Center here in New York for a roundtable on Hypergraphia and Hypographia, two terms that I had never before heard in my entire life.

Hypergraphia is the unstoppable drive to put words on paper or any other available surface. Basically, the people who have this write non-stop. They'll write on anything, napkins, match book covers, menus. We have a writer in our chapter who has something similar. She even brought in poems that she's written on napkins. People with this affliction, if you can call it that, will write even around the edges of what they've written to get it all down. It's almost like a verbal diarrhea. It's associated with temporal lobe changes like epilepsy and mania. Apparently Vincent van Gogh and Doestoevsky suffered from it, which makes sense when you consider that van Gogh didn't pick up a paint brush until he was 30 and then painted like a fiend until he committed suicide.

It sounds like a great disorder to have doesn't it? Unfortunately, it can be almost painful. I know that I have a hard time writing as fast as my mind is racing, so I can't imagine what it must be like for them.

Hypographia is basically writer's block, which most of us have experienced at one time or another. Of course, no one knows why some people suffer writer's block and some people don't. It can come from experiencing a trauma in your life, that prevents you from sitting down and writing, or it can come from not being able to turn off that internal editor in your head, that constantly tells you that what you are writing is crap.

I personally have suffered from intense writer's block, particularly when my father died. I couldn't write for almost seven months because the grief was just so intense. There was just no way to write my way out of it. I just had to feel it and hope that I would come out the other end in one piece. I was literally hanging onto my sanity by my nails. There were days that I could barely make it out of bed to go to work, all I wanted to do was just crawl into a hole and pull it in after me. Seriously, I thought I was going to lose my mind.

I had lost my mother when I was 24, and I guess I didn't allow myself to really grieve then. I just threw myself into acting and stage managing. So in a sense, I was allowing myself to feel the grief that I had bottled up for 11 years and that combined with my grief over my father just pulled me into the muck.

The internal infernal editor is my other problem. I've managed to turn that off to a certain extent but only by allowing myself to get the first draft out on paper before I edit. If I write a chapter and then edit, I get bogged down in thinking that it's the most horrible thing I've ever written. I really admire writers who can take a month just to write a chapter or a sentence. I was talking to cutie pie author after the roundtable and he was telling me that he's lucky if he writes a chapter in a month, and I'm thinking wow, I once wrote a book in a month. I'm not saying it was a good book, but I wrote it. Jonathan Lethem was talking last night about how he loves going over the sentence structure and playing with the words. The Queen Bee, who's workshop I was in for two years, took five years to write her third novel.

My concern has always been about the story, and the emotions. I probably spend more time trying to get the reader into my character's heads and what they're feeling. I suppose if I wrote literary fiction, I would probably write slower, but I don't. I write genre fiction and I write pretty fast. Not Meg Cabot/Nora Roberts fast, but I could easily write two books a year. As it is, I try to write everyday, even if it's just this blog.

And I never have a problem with finding ideas. My brain teems with plots and characters, some of which will probably never see the light of day unless I'm planning on living to be 150!

The discussion at times got a bit estoteric and eggheady but most of it was informative. This graphic artist gave his solution for writer's block. He told an audience member who stated that her problem was her internal critic, that she should just write the worst film ever, direct it badly, cast really bad actors, edit it badly and then show it to her friends, and then her worst fears would be realized and then she could move on!

Sounds a bit extreme but I see where he was going with the idea.

Anyone suffer from writer's block? And what did you do to get past it?

EKM

So Dumbledore is Gay!

Unless you've been living under a huge meteor, the news came out last week via J.K. Rowling that Dumbledore is gay, and that he was in love with an old schoolmate. Can I just say right here that I don't care? Seriously why was this big news? Meg Cabot announced on her blog that she knew it all along. I must have been missing something when I read all 7 books because frankly it never occurred to me to question Dumbledore's sexuality or indeed any of the adults in the books. Why? Because it had nothing to do with the story!

Really, what would be the point on speculating how many times a week Mr. & Mrs. Weasley get up to it? Or whether or not Hagrid will ever find a woman? Or what the deal is with Professor McGonagle. Or we to suspect that she and Professor Trelawney were life partners? I guess the reason that I never figured out the whole 'Dumbledore is gay' angle is because Harry didn't. If he didn't care through out all 7 books what Dumbledore got up to in his spare time, then why should I are?

And Harry was pretty busy throughout the books, what with trying to keep himself from being killed by Voltemort and basically saving the wizarding world from evil. Not to mention the Muggles. And studying for his exams, and learning potions, and hanging out with Hermione and Ron.

My only concern about J.K. Rowlings revelation is that this just gives the haters out there one more reason to ban the book from schools and libraries. I can just seem them accusing Dumbledore of being a pedophile (he did spent lots of time alone with Harry in his office), and of promoting anti-family values and alternative lifestyles.

Does anyone else out there care or knew that Dumbledore was gay?

EKM

London Calling

So I'm off to London the week of Thanksgiving. Since I didn't go to National this year, I'm using the money I would have spent and treating myself to a week in my favorite place on earth.

Unfortunately, my good friend Chip can't put me up this time, so I'm staying at a lovely little hotel near Knightsbridge called the Claverley. Just around the corner from Harrods where they have a Laduree tea room and near Harvey Nichols and the Mandarin Oriental hotel.

The good news is that Continental has this deal where you don't get charged for 90 days, which is sweet. And I'll be racking up the miles which will hopefully pay for my trip to San Fran for Nationals next year.

I'm having Thanksgiving on Saturday instead of Thursday, which is okay by me, because I don't really celebrate the holiday, what with the Pilgrims giving the Indians small pox blankets and everything. Plus the Pilgrims were notoriously religiously intolerant. So I'll be drinking wine and breaking bread with my English and American friends who live in London.

Plan on seeing some theater. I always make a list before I leave of the shows I definitely want to see, and then some alternatives just in case I can't get tickets. Which never happens, but I like to be prepared. I don't do much shopping in London primarily because it's so expensive to buy anything, especially clothes in London. And the pound is worth almost $2.00! Last year, when I went, I did buy this gorgeous red dress, but that was an aberration. Not going to be doing that this time.

Books, on the other hand, going to be hard to leave those behind. Waterstones is one of my favorite bookstores and now they have several Borders in London as well now. Lots of research books to buy for my other blog Scandalous Women. And Charing Cross road is littered with second hand bookstores.

The other thing I hope to do, besides visit the Tower of London which I also haven't done in years, is take the Jack the Ripper walking tour. I've taken it before but it's always a blast. Paticularly if Donald Rumbelow leads it since he's considered to be one of the leading authorities on the Ripper. I would love to know what he thinks of Patricia Cornwell's theories.

I'm hoping to get a day in Bath, keep your fingers crossed. I haven't been back in ten years, and I'm looking forward to going and heading to the Jane Austen Centre. Hopefully, I'll have a camera this time so that I can take pictures to post on the blog.

I'm so excited!

Thanks for reading,

EKM

22 Ways to Tell You're Grown Up

1. Your houseplants are alive, and you can't smoke any of them.

2. Having sex in a twin bed is out of the question.

3. You keep more food than beer in the fridge.

4. 6:00 am is when you get up, not when you go to bed.

5. You hear your favorite song in an elevator.

6. You watch the weather channel.

7. Your friends marry and divorce instead of "hook up" and "break up."

8. You from 130 days of vacation time to 14.

9. Jeans and a sweater no longer qualify as "Dressed Up."

10. You're the one called the police because those %&@# kids next door won't turn down their stereo.

11. Sleeping on the couch makes your back hurt.

12. You take naps

13. Dinner and a movie is the whole date instead of the beginning of one.

14. Eating a basket of chicken wings at 3 am would severely upset, rather than settle your stomach.

15. You go to the drug store for Ibuprofen and antacid, not condoms and pregnancy tests.

16. A $4.00 bottle of wine is not longer "Pretty good shit."

17. You actually eat breakfast food at breakfast time.

18. "I just can't drink the way I used" replaces "I'm never going to drink that much again."

19. 90% of the time you spend in front of the computer is for real work.

20. You drink at home to save money before going to a bar.

21. When you find out your friend is pregnant, you congratulate them instead of asking "Oh crap, what the hell happened?"

22. You read this entire list looking desperately for one sign that doesn't apply to you and can't find one to save your sorry butt.

Welcome Dee Davis!

The Lady Novelist welcomes Dee Davis this week to Got it Goin On. Her highly acclaimed first novel, Everything In Its Time, was published in July 2000. Since then, among others, she’s won the Booksellers Best, Golden Leaf, Texas Gold and Prism awards, and been nominated for the National Readers Choice Award, the Holt and two RT Reviewers Choice Awards. To date, she has sold fifteen books and three novellas. Her most recent novel, Chain Reaction, was a Golden Leaf finalist for Best Single Title at the New Jersey Romance Writers conference this October.

A town destroyed…A sole survivor…A terrible secret…
Artist Mia Kearney has the perfect life: A successful career, a home she loves, amazing friends…until her world explodes one hot August morning. Lone survivor of a nuclear accident, Mia awakens in a government facility, faced with Homeland Security agent Nicholas Price, a man who wants answers she knows she doesn’t have.

When Mia escapes, Nick has a choice to make. The CIA wants him off the case, but instinct tells him not to let Mia out of his sight.

Now the web of deceit that’s woven tightly around them is about to unravel, and someone out there won’t be satisfied until Cedar Branch’s last surviving resident is dead…


Q: Tell us a little about yourself, what is your background and how long have you been writing before you were published.

Q: Tell us about when you got “the call”

I was actually asleep. And was so excited by the news that I hung up on my agent before I realized that I had no idea who I’d actually sold the book too. Had to call her back to find out for sure. And then spent the rest of the day shaking with amazement and excitement.

Q: What made you choose romance?


I’m a sucker for happy couples and could never get enough. Wanted more with Meg and Calvin, cried when I didn’t get to see Cinderella get married (TV version), thought Aragorn and Arwen should have had more “screen” time…you get the idea. Basically, I love a happy ending. And as a romantic suspense writer, I love the idea of integrating the suspense plotline with the romance.

Q: What you do love about writing romance?

The riding off into the sunset moment, and the moment when the hero and/or heroine realizes they don’t have to go through life on their own.


Q: Your new book A Match Made on Madison is kind of a departure for you, being more women’s fiction. It also involves professional matchmakers. What sparked the idea? Was it a character? A scene you just couldn’t get out of your head?

The idea actually came from an article in the New York Times that my agent sent to me. From there the idea of Match evolved. My love for Jane Austen’s Emma also played a part in that evolution.


Q: Did you have to do any major research for this book? Did you stumble across anything really interesting that you didn’t already know?

Unlike my suspense novels, I really didn’t do major research for the book. Although I did call on my experiences in Manhattan and of course on my favorite places in the city. Hence, many of Vanessa’s favorites are in actuality also mine.


Q: You started out writing time travel, and now you write romantic suspense for HQN, and anthologies for Berkley (Hell with the Ladies, Hell on Heels) along with Julie Kenner and Kathleen O’Reilly. What has that been like? How do you juggle multiple projects?


I like writing different kinds of projects. Although to be honest, both the time travels and the anthologies are romantic suspense at their basic core, which means that it’s not as much of a departure as one might initially think. Juggling projects can be tricky. Good time management is the key. And a lot of BIC (butt in chair).


Q. What/Who do you like to read?


I read a little bit of everything really. Madeline L’Engle was a favorite. Also C.S. Lewis and Tolkien. Mary Stewart is my favorite author. I am currently into Emily Giffin, and Barbara Samuel. And I always buy Michael Crichton. I tend to love books more than authors, although I do glom when I find someone new. My favorite book is probably To Kill A Mockingbird. Although My Brother Michael and A Wrinkle in Time are close seconds.


Q. What is your writing process? Do you plot extensively first or do you tend to “fly in the mist?” Has your process changed over time? Do you write multiple drafts or clean up as you go?


I like to think of it as a road map. I know where I’m starting and where I’m ending. And a few main points along the way. The rest tends to develop during the journey. I think my process has remained pretty much the same over time. But I will say that each book is a little different. Sometimes the plot comes wholly baked and sometimes it’s a bit more sketchy. But with suspense there has to be at least some idea of plot right from the get go. I pretty much write one draft and clean up as I go. I have to know what’s happened pretty much as is in order to be able to know what’s going to happen next. It’s anal, I’ll admit it. But there you have it.


Q: Do you have any advice for aspiring novelists?


Write something every day, do your homework, treat writing as a career not a hobby, listen to others—but filter that through your own common sense, trust your instincts as a writer, and believe that dreams can come true.


Q. There was a recent article called "Harm in reading romance novels," Do you think romance novels harm or empower women?


I think it’s too easy to try and label things one way or the other. It’s a trap we’ve fallen into of late. A book, movie, game, whatever – does not have the power to do any of that. It can inspire us – but ultimately the choice is ours. So I’d argue vigorously with those who say there is harm – because the truth is that it’s a story. And at the core, its purpose is simply to entertain.



Q: Romance has garnered the biggest market share in genre fiction, yet it gets the least respect in popular and literary culture. Do you have any thoughts on why that is? Do you find this prejudice changing?


I know that a lot of people believe it’s improving. But personally I haven’t seen any change at all. But the truth is that all genre fiction is degenerated. And pretty much always has been. I think there are a multitude of cultural reasons for that. And in all honesty, it’s not particularly fair, but also not likely to change.


Q. What are you planning to work on next?

I’m currently working on Set-Up in SoHo, the follow-up book for A Match Made on Madison. And playing with new ideas for my next romantic suspense.


Thanks Dee! You can purchase both of Dee's books Chain Reaction and A Match Made on Madison from Barnes and Noble, and Amazon.com.

Goin' Country

I thoroughly humiliated myself this afternoon, trying to be stupidly manipulative with cutie pie author, instead of being happy go lucky. So I thought I'd try and cheer myself up by writing a happy post for a change. I have a guilty secret, I kind of like country music. Not all country music. I'm more of a Dixie Chicks/Gretchen Wilson/Keith Urban/The Mavericks country music fan. Not traditional country. And why do I feel guilty? Probably for the same reason that I feel guilty that Gone with the Wind is one of my favorite movies. Country music is probably the whitest music on the planet. Seriously, apart from Charlie Pride and Cowboy Troy, can you name another country music artist of color?

Well CMT is trying to change that. Sort of. They just announced that they're doing a show that gives celebrities a chance to become country music starts. People like Maureen McCormick, Sisqo and Bobby Brown. That's right, I said Sisqo "Mr. Thong song" and Bobby Brown, the man who sang 'My Perogative' and 'Ain't Nobody Humping Around.' They're going to try and turn themselves into country music stars.

I don't know whether to laugh or to cry that Bobby Brown has been reduced to this. I refused to watch his Bravo tv show because I thought it looked like a train wreck. But I have to admit that the idea of him singing something like Garth Brooks 'Friends in Low Places' has me slightly intrigued. As well as frightened. But then again, he and Sisqo could do a duet and sing, 'Save a Horse, Ride a Cowboy'!

And now Blogger is giving me fits so I can't post the picture of Rissi Palmer that I had planned to post. She's a female Country singer who just happens to be African-American, and she's really good. And she's getting a pretty big push in Nashville. Whether or not this turns into record sales or radio play, I have no idea, but I admire her for sticking to her guns and deciding that what she really wanted to do was put out a country album. Apparently a few years ago, she'd been offered a pop deal with Jimmy Jam's record label and she turned it down to pursue her dream of country stardom.

Her album drops on Tuesday and I for one will be standing in line to pick up a copy. You can watch the video for her song "Country Girl" here:

Thanks for reading,

EKM

Oooh My Head!

The PMS dwarfs and the Hangover Fairy decided to come over to my house to party, so this is going to be an extremely short post.

I'm feeling a little fragile after heading down to the Happy Ending Lounge on the LES last night along with Megan Frampton to hear Jane Lockwood and Colette Gale read excerpts from their recent works. It was all part of the "Virgin Reading" series that they do the the third Thursday of the month. Virgin meaning have never read their work in public before. Oh, and all the readings were erotic!

I'd met Jane at the NJRW conference and I'd very briefly met Colette in her other guise as Colleen Gleason last year in Atlanta, so I was really looking forward to getting out and having fun. And I did. A little too much fun if you want to know the truth. Vodka and I don't really mix all that well.

The readings ran from the sublime to the ridiculous, the sublime being Colette and Jane. The first reading by the woman who hosted the series wasn't bad, but it made me for the mental, emotional and physical health of the protagonist who was promiscuous in the extreme. The second reading we hit the ridiculous. I have no idea really what this one was about. Something to do with a drug deal maybe and the protagonist cheating her boyfriend with someone named Lynx.

I kind of had a hard time concentrating because the grammar was so atrocious in the piece whe was reading. I'm not sure if that was a character choice but it kind of took me out of things when she used the word 'spellbounded.'

I enjoyed the two pieces by the men which were more comical and completely different from each other. One way a gay version of James Bond called James Blond which featured clever play on names, and the second was about a couple who have sex in the monkey house at the zoo, literally in with the monkeys.

And then we had the lovely Jane and Colette. Colette's book is an erotic version of Phantom of the Opera which is why I have this lovely picture of Gerard Butler as the Phantom called Unmasqued: An Erotic Novel of The Phantom of the Opera.

Both pieces made me realize that I'm more of an erotic romance type of girl and not really one for straight erotica. I like a little emotion and plot with my sex, which Jane and Colette have in spades. I have a lovely signed copy of Colette's book to give away in November for our monthly raffle. Every month we raffle off a basket and November's theme is France, because Marie Antoinette and I share a birthday.

Afterwards we took the train to the village and had cheese fries and conversation until the witching hour.

Thanks for reading,

EKM

What Super Heroine Are You?

You Are Buffy the Vampire Slayer

"We saved the world. I say we have to party."

What Superheroine Are You?

I heart Target

So I'm perusing People magazine this morning online, discovering that David Hasselhoff has no sense of grammar, when I noticed that Hollywould now has a collection for Target.

If you don't know who Hollywould is, she's a high-end shoe designer along the lines of Christian Louboutin and Jimmy Choo, but American and a woman. I've long coveted her shoes but even on sale, I can't afford them. But thanks to the gods at Target, I very much can.

The dress is by Alice Temperley for Target. She's also an expensive designer, whose clothes go for thousands at Saks Fifth Avenue and Bergdorf's, but this dress cost me $49.99 not including shipping and handling (I ordered online since I knew my Target in Riverdale was not going to have it).

The shoes below are the Hollywould shoes that I ordered which I think will go very well with the Alice Temperley dress.

I just loved the cute little bow on the front. They also have a red pair that are peep toe that I might get to wear with a black dress or a gray skirt instead of black pumps.

It's not just clothes that I love buying at Target. They also have cosmetics from Boots in London, and now the Bliss Spa has a line of bath products at the store. I also bought my new answering machine/phone there and a combo alarm clock/radio/CD player for my bureau.

I don't think I've ever gone to Target without coming out with something, and half the time, I look longingly at the things I still want to buy, like these gorgeous red dishes that I saw. And some absolutely stunning bedding that I want to get. Not to mention microwaves, and a great red tea pot (as you can see I have a thing for red).

Having a Target so close to my house by subway (it's just 6 stops on the 9 train, takes about 20 minutes to get there) is seriously going to wreck havoc on my bank balance.

But it's just so addictive. I mean look at this sweet little bag that I bought to replace my Isaac Mizarahi one (also from Target). How could I resist when it was only $29.99?

Do you shop at Target? What was the best thing that you bought there?

Halloween Madness

Halloween is two weeks from this very day and for once I'm actually getting started early trying to find a costume, instead of waiting until the last minute and then throwing something together, when I discover that all the good costumes are gone.

I don't know why, but I feel such pressure to have an amazing costume. Probably because my friends always come up with most outstanding costumes. One year, my friend Lucia, went as Desdemona, complete with a pillow on top of her head, and white make-up, and Maria went as the corpse bride. The year before that Maria went as Ophelia complete with drowned weeds.

Last year, I just wore a black evening gown, strapped a fake gun in a holster to my thigh, along with some stuff from the Spy store and went as International Woman of Mystery, Femme Fatale.

Now this year, I have a dilemma, what to go as? I had high hopes of going as the Empress Josephine but unless I can persuade my friend to make an appointment a the Costume Collection here in New York (where I can rent a costume for $45), I'm out of luck. I have a particular dress in mind which makes it even harder. It should be black and gold (I look really good in those colors). Alas, the only other Josephine costume I could find on the web was sold out (clearly other people have had the same idea as moi!).

So I thought of purchasing this lovely Carmen Mirandesque costume that I saw on the In Character costume web-site. It's outrageous, and unexpected, but do I date? Or do I play it safe and go as a saucy pirate wench? There's kind of a been, there done that quality about being a pirate wench. I went one year as a female buccaneer, so I'm kind of repeating myself. Plus since Pirates of the Caribbean, Part 472 came out this summer, everyone and there mother is probably going to go as a pirate (like the year that Cat Woman came out and everyone, including some guys, went as her.)

Or I can wear this costume, and go as Lola Montez, who I blogged about over at Scandalous Women this week. It looks exactly like the costume that Lola used to wear on stage when she did her infamous 'Spider Dance,' in various locales. The dance was so outrageous and considered vulgar, that Lola would be booed by the audience. At least by the men who were distracted by her shapely ankles, and magnificent bosoms.

So, Cha-Cha or Lola Montez?

EKM

Welcome Anna DePalo!

The Lady Novelist is pleased to welcome RWA NYC member and Silhouette Desire author Anna DePalo to Got It Goin On today. Anna's June 2007 release, An Improper Affair was recently nominated for New Jersey Romance Writer's prestigious Golden Leaf Award in the short contemporary category, and was 4 on Borders' series romance best-seller list and #36 on Nielsen BookScan's romance best-seller list. And her latest release, Millionaire's Wedding Revenge reached #1 on the Borders Group/Waldenbooks series romance best seller list and was awarded 4 Stars by RT Book Club.





Don't deceive a man with money.
The Miami Millionaire could have any woman--but Stephen Garrison intended to have newly returned Megan Simmons. She ended their sizzling affair years ago.... leaving without explanation.... leaving Stephen determined to seek his revenge. But his plan to seduce his ex-lover, was met with an unexpected discovery: she'd had his child. And now it was no longer enough to seduce Megan back into his bed. Stephen had decided marriage would be the ultimate payback.












Q: Tell us a little about yourself, what is your background and how long have you been writing before you were published.









I was an intellectual property attorney for close to seven years. I joined Romance Writers of America soon after I graduated from law school. So, I was working my way to publication between 1998/1999 and 2001, when I pitched my first completed manuscript to a Harlequin/Silhouette editor at the New Jersey Romance Writers conference. That book saw publication as Having the Tycoon’s Baby (Silhouette Desire, August 2003) and went on to win the Romantic Times Reviewers’ Choice Award for Best First Series Romance.


Q: Tell us about when you got “the call.”


It was soon after my wedding in 2002. I came home from work and there was a phone message from the Harlequin/Silhouette editor that I’d pitched a manuscript to months before at the New Jersey Romance Writers conference. She wanted to buy the book! The rest is kind of a euphoric haze for me , but I recall jumping up and down, grinning like a fool, shouting “yeah!” and then calling my husband at work to share the good news.



Q: What made you choose romance?

I’ve always been a voracious reader and never more so than with the romance genre. I’m a fairly optimistic person, and I like happy endings. I can always count on a good romance novel to make me relax and unwind, laugh and be entertained. I don’t think there’s much more to it than that!


Q: What you do love about writing romance?


I like to write generally (it seems to go hand in hand with loving to read!). But I especially enjoy spinning upbeat, entertaining stories of the sort that I prefer reading. Plus, I have an active imagination, and writing gives it a necessary outlet!

Q: Your new book, Millionaire’s Wedding Revenge is set in Miami. What sparked the idea? Was it a character? A scene you just couldn’t get out of your head?









Millionaire’s Wedding Revenge is part of the Dynasties: The Garrisons continuity series from Silhouette Desire (which features six books about different Garrison family members). Part of the idea for the series was that it was to be set in hot Miami Beach. I have to say, I was happy to go along! I’ve generally set my books in trendy urban settings (Boston, New York and, for next year, San Francisco), so I was pleased to explore another area with its own unique and yet identifiable culture.
Q: Did you have to do any major research for this book? Did you stumble across anything really interesting that you didn’t already know?


Well, I delved into Miami Beach’s interesting Art Deco architecture. I love Art Deco myself, and since my heroine was an interior designer, I needed to explore Miami Beach’s cultural scene even more. In the process of researching dialogue for my heroine, I picked up design tips from the newly redone White House Situation Room, believe it or not.




Q: You’ve written continuity books for Silhouette Desire. What has that been like? Anything that constrained you or that you had to plot carefully around?



I’ve enjoyed writing all the continuity books that I’ve participated in for Desire (Cause for Scandal, March 2006, part of Dynasties: The Elliotts; An Improper Affair, June 2007, part of Millionaire of the Month; and Millionaire’s Wedding Revenge, September 2007, part of Dynasties: The Garrisons). I enjoy working with other talented authors. Sometimes the broad outline of a continuity story will present some challenges as far as making everything fit together, but that’s the challenge and fun of working on a continuity. For example, in Cause for Scandal, according to the continuity idea, the heroine was supposed to be engaged to another man when she loses her virginity to the hero; it was a little tricky to make the heroine a sympathetic character, but I think I succeeded .
Q. What/Who do you like to read?


There are so many! Within fiction/romance, I like Regency historicals (Lisa Kleypas, Madeline Hunter, and so many others!), contemporary romantic comedies (Susan Elizabeth Phillips) and category romances. Just now, I’ve dipped into paranormals with J.R. Ward’s Black Dagger Brotherhood. But I’d put Jane Austen at the top of any list!

Q. What is your writing process? Do you plot extensively first or do you tend to “fly in the mist?” Has your process changed over time? Do you write multiple drafts or clean up as you go?



I have to do a synopsis for my editor, so I always have an outline to work with. I usually breeze through the first three chapters of the manuscript, but then I have to stop to regroup and take stock. At that point, if I haven’t already done so, I do a sketch for each chapter (listing each scene with its main action and point of view). I make sure I know where the main points are supposed to occur (dark moment, climax, resolution, etc.).





In the past, I’ve also done rough character sketches of my hero and heroine, listing each character’s name, occupation, age, hair color, build, likes/dislikes, and personality traits. The character sketches helped me when I got stuck: I’d go back to them and see if there was any detail I could explore and use to move the story forward. These days, those character sketches tend to stay in my head rather than getting written down.






I write a fairly clean first draft. In the past, I’d circle back and edit what I wrote again and again until I reached the end. Now, I try to get as close to finishing as possible before doing much editing (I find that’s a time saver; since story details always change as I write, leaving the editing for later saves me from unnecessary work).

Q: Do you have any advice for aspiring novelists?

Keep writing! You will get better! Writers are made, not born. Also, write what you are passionate about. It’ll make a better story.


Q. There was a recent article called "Harm in reading romance novels," Do you think romance novels harm or empower women?

It amazes me how often this question comes up! I can think of many things that “harm women” in this world, and I doubt romance novels are even in the top 100. And for the record, I like to give romance readers a little credit: romance novels are entertainment, and the readers know it. Does anyone think a (male) reader of thrillers is going to go out and attempt James Bond-like stunts? Of course not!
Q: Romance has garnered the biggest market share in genre fiction, yet it gets the least respect in popular and literary culture. Do you have any thoughts on why that is? Do you find this prejudice changing?

I think the bias against the romance genre stems from the fact that it’s mostly entertainment by women for women. Things of that variety are generally undervalued and derogated, unfortunately. Some people might sniff that the romance genre is unrealistic, but the same can be said of science fiction and mystery, for example, and yet those genres don’t face the same prejudice. Other people might point to the sex (these are relationship books, after all), but how many esteemed male writers have had articles in Playboy and been none the worse off for it?
Q. What are you planning to work on next?


I just finished a stand-alone book for Silhouette Desire. CEO’s Marriage Seduction will be out in March 2008. It’s about a tough CEO who butts heads with his favorite heiress…until things take a turn for the steamy . After that, I’ll be wrapping up a 2008 continuity series for Desire, Park Avenue Scandals, with The Billionaire in Penthouse B in December.

Thanks Anna for stopping by! You can purchase Millionaire's Wedding Revenge from Amazon, Barnes & Noble or Eharlequin.



Stay tuned for more interviews with RWA NYC authors, Jule McBride, Dee Davis and Kathleen O'Reilly in coming weeks.

Blog Action Day at Got it Goin On

Today is Blog Action Day, so in the spirit I'm using this post to write about what I try to do for the environment.

Well, for one, I try to buy my paper towels and toilet paper at Whole Foods since they sell recycled paper. And I've begun trying to buy household products that are environmentally friendly I also donate books and magazines to the public library for sale. I seperate my cans and bottles and either take them to the grocery store to recycle or put them in the special blue bags downstairs.

I've begun shredding documents and also putting them in recycling bags so that hopefully the paper can be pulped and then reused again in the future. However, I'm really bad when it comes to water. I love taking showers and baths, and I know they are a notorious waste of water, but for me, it's a way to relax at the end of the day or to wake up in the morning. On the other hand, I have become better at turning off the water while I brush my teeth and wash my face at night.

My father, without even knowing it, was kind of an environmentalist. Of course, my mother and I just called it being cheap, when he would walk around the house turning off all the lights, and keeping the heat to an excruciating 5o degrees at our house upstate. Whenever my mother and I would complain that it was cold in the house, he would just tell us to put on a sweater.

My parents both grew up in the depression, so I was taught never to throw things out if they could still be used. I haven't gone as far as changing the filter in the lightbulbs the way Marge did on The Simpsons last night, but I resole my shoes and boots instead of throwing them out, and I try to donate all my clothes to either Goodwill or the Salvation Army.

I'm also thinking of buying a refurbished laptop instead of spending the money on a new one, and I would love to donate my old computer, but I don't know if there's anyone out there who wants a computer that's almost 11 years old.

If anyone knows of an organization that takes old computers let me know.

EKM

Movie Review: Elizabeth the Golden Age

Yesterday, after our chapter meeting, I decided to go and see Elizabeth the Golden Age, to cheer myself up after a recent romantic disappointment. I figured Cate Blanchette, beautiful costumes, and Clive Owen, I was going to be in heaven. After all, my name is Elizabeth and I was seeing a movie with my name in big lights.

Well, heaven, not so much. I really wanted to like this movie. I love Tudor history and I love Cate Blanchett. The first movie, Elizabeth, which turned her into an international star was wonderful even if it was crap history.

Unfortunately this movie was even crappier history than the first one. I knew while watching it that they were trying to cram way too much into one movie. Mary Queen of Scots and the Spanish Armada? They spent more time on Philip II of Spain they did on poor Mary Queen of Scots.

And why was Samantha Morton doing a Scottish accent? Mary Queen of Scots lived in Scotland from the age of 5 until she was 19 when she came back to Scotland. She spoke french during her time at the French court, since she was briefly Queen of France. So what in god's green earth made them think she would sound Scottish? Not to mention that they never even tell you in the movie why she's a prisoner in the first place or the fact that she'd been locked up for 18 years. The Babington plot which I'm just guessing is what I saw in the movie, was totally convoluted in the film. I had no idea who Rhys Ifans was supposed to be playing or that Walsingham's half brother was involved.

Which brings me to Clive Owen. Maybe I'm biased but there really wasn't enough of him in this movie. And once again it was crap history. Sir Walter Raleigh and Beth Throckmorton didn't get married until 1591, long after the Spanish Armada, and there is no evidence that Raleigh was involved with Sir Francis Drake (who was introduced about 5 seconds before the very end of the movie. The hero of the whole thing and he's barely mentioned. Sheesh!)

But doesn't Clive look dashing hanging from the mast in a scene where the British decide to burn a bunch of ships as the Spanish Armada comes sailing up right into the blazing inferno thereby saving Britain from speaking with a Castilian accent. There's an incredibly sexy scene where he's undressing Bess, at the same time that Elizabeth is looking at her naked body in the mirror.



Another problem with this film is that Cate Blanchett does not look like an aging monarch. She looks fantastic. Elizabeth at this time was 55 years old. She'd spent years wearing white lead paint on her face. The one thing they did get right was all the wigs that the Queen wore.

The costumes were absolutely stunning, and the performances were uniformly good, but it seemed pretty paint by numbers to me. There was none of the true excitement that there was in the first movie. Maybe because they tried to cram too many events into the movie, with very little explanation, as if everyone had had a crash course in English history before they came to see the movie.

Or it might possibly be Elizabeth I overload. Since the first movie came out we've had miniseries starring Ann-Marie Duff called the Virgin Queen, and one starring Helen Mirren, not to mention David Starkey's excellent documentary that was shown on PBS. Everyone just seemed tired in this one. Even Clive wasn't twinkling with his usual intensity. Seriously a whole movie could be done just on Sir Walter Raleigh trying to establish the colony of Roanoke and we all know what happened with that.

Still there were some nice moments, such as when Elizabeth, suspecting something was going with with Bess and Raleigh has them dance the Volta which chiefly consists of the man lifting the woman into the air, and the scene towards the end where Elizabeth exhorts her troops before they go into battle. She was wearing a lovely flowing wig and armour that looked like it was designed by Dolce and Gabbana.

I would have to give this movie a C+.

A Kiss is just a Kiss, except when it's not

I've always found kissing to be one of the most intimate things that two people can do together. In fact, I've read there are prostitutes who won't kiss their clients, because it's deemed too intimate, something they want to share with the man or woman in their life, not a stranger.

A good kiss can make you weak in the knees, a bad kiss can make you want to wash you mouth out with soap. If a man is a bad kisser, it kind of doesn't make you want to find out what else he might be bad at. Of course, it's entirely possible that a guy can suck at kissing and be good at sex, but it kind of ruins the mood.

Ross, on Friends, once said that kissing was like the band that opened up for Aerosmith. Something that you have to sit through until you get to the main event. Is it just me or is that not the most depressing thing that you've ever heard?

When I was acting, I always made it clear to my partners that there would be no tongue when we kissed on stage. Most actors were okay with that, except for one actor I worked with on a show, who tried to give me a tonsillectomy when we kissed. Needless to say, I complained to the director!

I've also always had or tried to have clear boundaries with my male friends as well. Fine to kiss them on the cheek, or on both cheeks but no kissing on the lips. It just confuses things. The only time that I've kissed a male friend on the lips, he was someone that I once dated, and it was New Year's Eve. And things were looking like they were about to progress to boyfriend/girlfriend territory again.

But I know that not everyone thinks that way. There are men, and probably women out there, who think it's fine to kiss their friends of the opposite sex on the lips. But when does it cross the line? What if one person knows that they have a significant other, which for some reason they haven't revealed, and they've been kissing you on the lips. Have they transgressed?

Questions of the day: How important is it that someone be a good kisser? Have you ever dated anyone that wasn't? And is it ever okay to kiss your friends of the opposite sex on the lips?

EKM